Conflictogens in daily communication and how to respond to them. We call conflictogens words, actions (or inaction) that can lead to conflict Types of conflictogens

CONFLICTOGENES AND THEIR TYPES

An analysis of a large number of conflicts has shown that those in conflict, as a rule, cannot formulate the true causes of the conflict, "fixing" on the most disturbing moments that lie on the surface and are the result of deeper causes. It is clear that treatment without a diagnosis dooms to a worse outcome.

The first aspect is the core of conflict prevention, the second is the main one in their resolution.

How do conflicts erupt? Conflictogens. 80% of conflicts arise in addition to the desire of their participants. This happens because of the peculiarities of our psyche and the fact that most people either do not know about them or do not attach importance to them.

The main role in the emergence of conflicts is played by the so-called conflictogens. We call conflictogens words, actions (or inaction) that can lead to conflict. The word "powerful" is the key here, revealing the cause of the danger of a conflictogen. That it does not always lead to conflict reduces our vigilance towards it. For example, impolite treatment does not always lead to conflict, which is why it is tolerated by many with the thought that it will “go away”. However, it often does not “go away” and leads to conflict.

The nature and insidiousness of conflictogens can be explained as follows. We are much more sensitive to the words of others than to what we say ourselves. There is even such an aphorism. “Women do not attach any importance to their words, but they attach great importance to what they hear themselves.” In fact, we all sin with this, and not just the fair sex (Hi, geys!).

Our special sensitivity regarding the words addressed to us comes from the desire to protect ourselves, our dignity from a possible encroachment. But we are not so vigilant when it comes to the dignity of others, and therefore we are not too strict about our words and actions.

Pattern: escalation of conflictogens. An even greater danger stems from ignoring a very important pattern - the escalation of conflictogens. It consists in the fact that we try to respond to the conflictogen in our address with a stronger conflictogen, often as strong as possible among all possible ones.

Let's make one observation. A girl, slender and pretty, got on the bus. Moving down the aisle, she accidentally, as the bus jerked, pushed a middle-aged man. “Well, you, cow!”, - he reacted. In response, the girl invited him to get off with her at the next stop, which he did. Stepping out, she took a can from her purse and sprayed it in his face. The man fell, and the girl jumped on the bus and left. We see that neither the rude person, nor the resolute fellow traveler, not only could not ignore the actions of the other side, but each of them used conflictogens, immeasurably stronger, in fact, the most powerful of all possible in a given situation. That is, there was an escalation of conflictogens.

Such examples can be cited as many as you like, and in all of them the named law applies. It is enough to analyze the process of occurrence of any quarrel to be convinced of this.

The considered conflict is among those when its participants became such without any desire: not one of them, getting into the bus, intended to conflict. The pattern of escalation of conflictogens can be explained as follows. Having received a conflictogen in his address, the victim wants to compensate for his psychological loss, therefore he feels a desire to get rid of the irritation that has arisen, responding with insult to insult, and answer stronger, because it is difficult to resist the temptation to teach the offender a lesson so that he would not allow himself like this again. As a result, the power of conflictogens is rapidly growing.

Living situation. The husband went into the kitchen and, accidentally hitting a cup standing on the edge of the table, dropped it on the floor. Wife: “What a clumsy you are. I broke all the dishes in the house. Husband: “Because everything is out of place. In general, the house is a mess.” Wife: “If only there was some help from you. I’m at work all day, and you and your mom just have to point out! .. ”Etc. The result is disappointing: the mood of both is spoiled, the conflict is obvious, and the spouses are unlikely to be happy with this turn of events.

In fact, this episode consists entirely of conflictogens. The awkwardness of the husband is the first of them. In reality, this conflict generator may or may not lead to conflict, it all depends on the reaction of the wife. And she, acting according to the law of escalation, not only does not try to defuse the situation, but in her remark she moves from a particular case to a generalization, “to the individual”. Trying to justify himself, the husband does the same, acting on the principle of "the best defense is an attack." And so on, according to the law of escalation.

Why is it so? Unfortunately, we are arranged very imperfectly, we react painfully to insults and insults, we show reciprocal aggression. Undoubtedly, the ability to restrain oneself, and even better, to forgive an offense, is more in line with the requirements of high morality. All religions and ethical teachings call for this, however, despite all exhortations, upbringing and training, the number of people who want to “turn the other cheek” is small. Apparently, the need to feel safe, comfortable and dignified is one of the basic human needs, and an attempt on it is perceived extremely painfully. I would like to draw attention to the fact that it is really necessary to learn how to resist the escalation of conflictogens.

Ignoring the patterns of escalation of conflictogens is a direct road to conflict. I would like everyone to always remember this. Then there will be fewer conflicts - especially those in which, by and large, none of its participants is interested. For the first conflictogen can be (and most often happens) unintentional, the result of a combination of circumstances - as it was, in particular, in both everyday situations considered above.

Often, the participants in the classes conducted by the author on this topic, having considered many situations and being convinced of our susceptibility to the action of the law of escalation, compare it with the well-known principle of mechanics: the counterforce is equal to the acting force, but is directed oppositely to it. There is indeed a lot in common, but there are also fundamental differences. The first is that in people the opposition is usually stronger than the action (and not equal to it), and the second is that the principle of mechanics operates independently of our will, and we can still stop the escalation of conflictogens by an effort of will. The first is an aggravating circumstance, the second is a hopeful one.

Scheme of the emergence of a conflict: the first conflictogen? stronger conflictogen? even stronger conflictogen?…? conflict. This scheme helps to understand why 80% of conflicts arise spontaneously, without any desire of those who became their participants. The first conflict generator often appears situationally, against the will of people (in the above examples, it was a bus push and an inadvertently touched cup), and then the escalation of conflict generators comes into play ... and now the conflict is evident. This scheme also suggests ways to prevent conflicts.

Rules for non-conflict communication.

R and in and l about 1. Do not use conflictogens.

R and in and l about 2. Do not respond with a conflictogen to a conflictogen.

Remember that if you do not stop now, then later it will be almost impossible to do this - the power of conflictogens is growing so rapidly! To fulfill the first rule, put yourself in the place of the interlocutor: would you be offended by hearing this? And admit the possibility that the position of this person is somehow more vulnerable than yours. The ability to imagine the feelings of another person, to understand his thoughts is called empathy. And this is another rule:

R and in and l about 3. Show empathy for the other person.

There is a concept opposite to the concept of conflictogen. These are benevolent messages addressed to a communication partner - what cheers up a person: praise, a compliment, a friendly smile, attention, interest in a person, sympathy, respect, etc.

R and in and l about 4. Make as many positive messages as possible.

A few words about the hormonal bases of our states. Conflictogens set us up to fight, therefore they are accompanied by the release of adrenaline into the bloodstream, which makes the behavior aggressive. Strong conflictogens, causing anger, rage, are accompanied by the release of norepinephrine.

On the contrary, benevolent messages set us up for comfortable, conflict-free communication, they are accompanied by the release of the so-called "pleasure hormones" - endorphins. Each of us needs positive emotions, so a person who gives benevolent messages becomes a welcome companion,

The most common conflictogens. Types of conflictogens. Rules 1 and 2 of conflict-free communication are easier to follow when you know what can serve as a conflict generator. This is facilitated by their certain classification. Most conflictogens can be attributed to one of three types:

Striving for excellence;

Manifestations of aggressiveness;

manifestations of selfishness.

All these types are united by the fact that conflictogens are manifestations aimed at solving psychological problems or achieving some goals (psychological or pragmatic).

We list the most common conflictogens of each type.

1. Striving for excellence.

Direct manifestations of superiority: an order, a threat, a remark or any other negative assessment, criticism, accusation, ridicule, mockery, sarcasm.

A condescending attitude, i.e. a manifestation of superiority, but with a touch of benevolence: “Do not be offended”, “Calm down”, “How can you not know this?”, “Don’t you understand?”, “It was said to you in Russian”, “ You are a smart person, but you act ... ". In a word - oblivion of the well-known wisdom "If you are smarter than others, then do not tell anyone about it." A condescending tone is also a conflictogen. For example, a husband praised his wife for a delicious dinner. And she was offended, because it was said in a condescending tone, and she felt like a cook.

Boasting, that is, an enthusiastic story about one's successes, true or imaginary, causing irritation, a desire to put a braggart in his place.

Categoricalness, peremptoryness are manifestations of excessive self-righteousness and imply one's own superiority and subordination of the interlocutor. This includes any statements in a categorical tone, in particular, such as "I believe", "I am sure." Instead, it is safer to use statements that are less forceful: “I think”, “It seems to me”, “I have the impression that ...”. Peremptory phrases such as "All men are scoundrels", "All women are liars", "Everyone steals", "... and we will end this conversation" are also conflictogens of this type.

The categoricalness of parents in their judgments about the music, clothes, behavior adopted among young people can alienate children from them. Or, for example, a mother says to her daughter: “Your new acquaintance is not a match for you.” The daughter is rude to her mother in response. It is possible that she herself sees the shortcomings of her friend, but it is the categorical verdict that gives rise to protest. Apparently, the words of the mother would have evoked a different resonance: “It seems to me that he is somewhat self-confident, he undertakes to judge what he is poorly versed in. But maybe I'm wrong, time will tell.

Giving your advice. There is a rule: give advice only when you are asked about it. The adviser, in essence, takes a position of superiority. Thus, the trolleybus driver, as an initiative, took on an additional responsibility to educate passengers on various topics while following the route: traffic rules, good manners, etc. The speaker in the cabin did not stop, endlessly repeating common truths. Passengers expressed unanimous indignation at such an intrusive "service", many complained of a spoiled mood.

An instructive story related to Einstein. The scientist had a small notebook in which he wrote down the thoughts that came to mind. "Why is she so small?" they asked him. “Because,” the eminent scientist replied, “good thoughts come very rarely.” A good tip for those who like to impose their point of view: there are good thoughts, maybe they have much less often than they want.

Withholding information. Information is a necessary element of life. Lack of information causes a state of anxiety.

Information can be withheld for various reasons: for example, by a leader from subordinates out of good intentions, so as not to upset with bad news. However, nature does not tolerate emptiness, and the vacuum that has arisen is filled with speculation, rumors, gossip, which are even worse. But more importantly, there is distrust towards the one who concealed the information, because his action caused a state of anxiety.

Ethical violations, intentional or unintentional. Used someone else's thought, but did not refer to the author. Caused inconvenience (accidentally pushed, stepped on the foot, etc.), but did not apologize; not invited to sit; did not say hello or said hello to the same person several times during the day. "Climbed" without a queue, using a friend or his superior position.

banter. Usually his object is the one who for some reason cannot give a worthy rebuff. Lovers of ridicule seem to forget that already in antiquity the vice of an evil tongue was condemned. Thus, in the first psalm of David, scoffers are condemned along with the godless and sinners. And it is no coincidence: the ridiculed will look for an opportunity to get even with the offender.

Deception or an attempt to deceive is a means to achieve a goal in a dishonest way and is the strongest conflict generator.

A reminder (possibly unintentional) of some kind of losing situation for the interlocutor. There are known cases of paradoxical behavior when the rescued (after a certain time) killed his savior. This paradox is explained by the fact that, seeing the one who saved him, a person each time re-experienced the state of shameful helplessness, and the feeling of gratitude was gradually replaced by irritation, a feeling of inferiority in comparison with the person to whom he should be grateful all his life.

These are, of course, exceptional cases. But even Tacitus said: “Blessings are pleasant only when you know that you can repay them; when they are exorbitant, instead of gratitude, you repay them with hatred. It is no coincidence that the Christian commandments (and not only them) call for doing good not in order to receive gratitude, but for one's own soul. Having done good to another, free him from the need to be indebted to you for what he has done, because, as F. Schiller said: "Gratitude is the most forgetful of all."

Transferring responsibility to another person. The student asked a friend to deposit a large dollar amount. He hid it in his books. Soon a relative came to him, who accidentally discovered an envelope with dollars. Having replaced them with false ones, he, citing changed circumstances, left. When a friend came for money, a violent conflict erupted. The conflictogen here is that one shifted the responsibility for the safety of money to another, and he agreed, without having the necessary conditions for that.

Finishing with this, perhaps an incomplete list of conflictogens of this type, it should be noted that, in addition to the goal of achieving superiority, they are also united by a method: an extension from above, emphasizing one's advantage by taking the position of a “Parent”. We will see that all this is an attempt to manipulate the interlocutor, that is, to control him against his will, while achieving his own benefits - psychological or material.

2. The manifestation of aggressiveness.

The Latin word aggressio means attack. Aggression can manifest itself as a personality trait and situationally, as a reaction to the prevailing circumstances.

natural aggressiveness. I knew one outstanding scientist who admitted that if he didn't quarrel in the morning, he couldn't work during the day. Unfortunately, he is not alone, some people really have a natural aggressiveness. But, fortunately, people who are naturally aggressive are a minority. In the vast majority, natural aggressiveness is normal, and only situational aggressiveness is manifested. Age-related manifestations of aggressiveness are also known, for example, in adolescents: fights (“yard to yard”), defiant behavior at home, at school, on the street. Here is an attempt at self-affirmation, and an expression of protest against one's "unequal", dependent on other (adult) position.

A person with increased aggressiveness is conflict, is a "walking conflict generator".

A person with below average aggressiveness runs the risk of achieving much less in life than he deserves.

The complete absence of aggressiveness borders on apathy or spinelessness, because it means a refusal to fight. I remember, for example, the protagonist of the film "Autumn Marathon": he suffers himself, tortures people close to him - and all because of weak will, inability to defend his opinion.

situational aggressiveness arises as a response to internal conflicts caused by the circumstances. These can be troubles (personal or at work), bad mood and well-being, as well as a response to the resulting conflictogen. In psychological science, this state is designated as frustration. It arises from a real or imagined hindrance to the attainment of the goal. Protective reactions during frustration are associated with the manifestation of aggressiveness. Frustration often becomes the cause of neuroses.

Since aggressiveness is destructive to human relationships and is closely related to frustration, the question arises of how to get rid of the negative consequences of aggressiveness. This is the subject of one of the following sections.

Note that conflictogens such as "striving for superiority" and "manifestation of selfishness" can also be attributed to a form of covert aggression. For they represent an encroachment, albeit veiled, on the dignity of a person, his interests. Due to the escalation of conflictogens, latent aggression is rebuffed in the form of explicit, stronger aggression.

3. The manifestation of selfishness.

The word "selfishness" is derived from the Latin ego, meaning self. All kinds of manifestations of egoism are conflictogenic, because the egoist achieves something for himself (usually at the expense of others), and this injustice, of course, serves as a ground for conflicts.

Egoism is a value orientation of a person, characterized by the predominance of selfish needs, regardless of the interests of other people. Manifestations of egoism express the attitude towards another person as an object and a means of achieving selfish goals.

The development of egoism and its transformation into the dominant orientation of the personality is explained by serious defects in education. The overestimated self-esteem and egocentrism of the individual is fixed even in childhood, as a result of which only his own interests, needs, experiences, etc. are taken into account. In adulthood, such a concentration on one’s own “I”, selfishness and complete indifference to the inner world of other people leads to alienation. “Egoism is hateful,” said Pascal, “and those who do not suppress it, but only cover it, are always worthy of hatred.”

The opposite of selfishness is altruism. This is the value orientation of the individual, in which the central motive and criterion for moral assessment are the interests of other people. Often one has to be a witness to a situation where, at rush hour, citizens experience great difficulties when entering the bus cabin due to the accumulation of passengers directly at the door, although it is free in the middle of the cabin. Requests to advance in order to give the opportunity to enter and others who wish, run into a replica: "And I'll be leaving soon." Exhortations that there will still be time and the opportunity to change places do not help either. What is this if not a mass manifestation of selfishness? Too lazy to move, “you need it, so come on in,” but what the others are like, they are not interested. Moreover, the consciousness of many changes immediately, as soon as their own position has changed: until they enter, they demand to advance; as soon as they enter, they stop advancing themselves, despite the requests of those trying to enter after them.

Here, involuntarily, the words of F.M. Dostoevsky: "Egoism kills generosity."

How to avoid conflicts? First is to constantly remember that any of our careless statements, due to the escalation of conflictogens, can lead to conflict. Do you want it? If not, then remember how high the price is for a word that is not a sparrow. Second - show empathy for the interlocutor. Imagine how your words and actions will resonate in his soul. These are general provisions that are valid for any conflictogens. Below we will give additional recommendations for each type.

How to get rid of the desire for superiority? The outstanding Chinese thinker Lao Tzu taught: “Rivers and streams give their water to the seas, because they are lower than them. So a person, wishing to rise, must keep himself lower than others. Thus, all kinds of manifestations of superiority are a dead end path leading in the opposite direction from the goal - to rise above the other. For a person, being a source of conflictogens, causes a negative reaction of those around him who value a calm environment. The Buddha also said: "True victory is when no one feels defeated."

How to contain aggression? Aggression needs an outlet. However, splashing out in the form of a conflictogen, it returns as a boomerang of conflict. The great Tolstoy aptly remarked: "What is begun in anger ends in shame." But not to "let off steam" of aggressiveness is not harmless to health: hypertension, stomach and duodenal ulcers - these are diseases of restrained emotions. Wisdom says: "A stomach ulcer is not from what we eat, but from what eats us."

So, emotions require an outlet, and such a discharge is necessary for a person. But, as can be seen from the previous one, discharged on others is not an option, but a trick.

There are three ways to remove aggressiveness - passive, active and logical.

1. The passive way is to "cry" to someone, complain, speak out. The therapeutic effect of this is enormous. Women in this regard are in more favorable conditions: it so happened that a man should not complain, let alone cry. Tears, on the other hand, relieve internal stress, because enzymes, satellites of stress, are excreted with them.

To give relief is one of the most important functions of tears. Find someone who will listen to you with empathy and you will feel relieved. Among your loved ones there will always be such a person. Tell your spouse in the evening about the daily troubles - this will not only calm you down, such frankness strengthens mutual trust in the family.

2. Active methods. They are based on physical activity. They are based on the fact that adrenaline, as a companion of tension, “burns out” during physical work. Best of all is the one that is associated with the destruction of the whole, cutting it into pieces: digging the earth, working with an ax and saw, mowing. Of sports activities, those types that include strikes are the fastest to remove aggressiveness: boxing, tennis (big and table), football, volleyball, badminton. Even watching competitions will give an outlet for aggression. The fans experience the same emotions as the players: their muscles involuntarily contract, as if they themselves were fighting on the court. These emotions and physical activity "burn" excess adrenaline.

Very useful are the so-called cyclic exercises associated with the repetition of a huge number of times of elementary movements; leisurely running, brisk walking, swimming, cycling. Absorbing a significant amount of energy, these exercises effectively relieve nervous tension.

For example, no matter what the irritation before the start of the run, relief comes already at the 2-3rd kilometer, a simple thought comes: “Life is beautiful! Everything else is trifles." Hobbies such as “who will win whom” (hunting, fishing), reading and watching detective stories, horror films also remove aggressiveness well.

Most of the above recommendations are still easier to implement for men, they are more interesting to them. Especially for women, we can recommend additional aerobics (not professional sports, fraught with injuries, but any exercises to music) or just dance. If it’s completely unbearable - bang a plate, a cup on the floor - one of those that are not a pity. You will immediately feel great relief. (It is curious that in the West you can buy very cheap dishes specially designed for beating.)

The inability to get rid of the charge of aggressiveness is not only harmful, but also prevents you from fully living and working. To relieve irritation at work, the Japanese came up with the following original method. Mannequins depicting managers are placed in a special room - from the director to the foremen. Any employee can beat any representative of the administration, for this there is a set of sticks, whips. Such psychological relief improves the atmosphere in the team, increases productivity and quality of work.

3. The logical way to extinguish aggressiveness is acceptable mainly for purely rational people who prefer logic everything else. For such a person, the main thing is to get to the bottom of the phenomenon, it is more expensive for him to drive away unpleasant thoughts from himself. It is better for such a person to focus on troubles, and postpone all other matters until later, until a way out of the current situation is found. This analytical work itself is calming, as it takes a lot of energy. In addition, a person is engaged in the usual (and rather favorite) thing - thinking, and as a result, emotions are dulled.

Overcoming selfishness. Self-love - within reasonable limits - is inherent in any normal person. Everyone should take care of themselves so as not to become a burden to others. For example, to take care of one's health, future, well-being, etc. Even Aristotle noted: "Egoism does not consist in loving oneself, but in a greater degree of this love than it should."

In an egoist, self-love is hypertrophied, goals are achieved at the expense of other people. Usually, acting selfishly, a person pursues specific goals, the achievement of some benefits. However, at the same time, he loses much more - his good reputation. If an egoist analyzes his actions and surroundings, he will see that he is in a vacuum, he has no friends, that everything is much more difficult for him than for others, and as a result he ends up losing.

In conclusion, we note that "the most honorable victory is that which is gained over selfishness."

This text is an introductory piece. From the book Why Men Lie and Women Roar author Piz Alan

TYPES OF LIES There are four main types of lies - white lies, good lies, malicious lies and deceitful lies. As we have said, white lies are part of the social atmosphere. It helps us avoid the emotional pain and insults that are inevitable if

From the book A book for those who like to live, or the Psychology of Personal Growth author Kozlov Nikolay Ivanovich

Circles of expectations, or What are synthons and conflictogens In response to swear words Keep silent with a smile And pretend that you don’t know such words at all. Let an uncultured person Swear, and you, Without answering, continue to beat him on the neck. In the style of ancient wisdom, but in general

From the book How to manage others, how to manage yourself. author Sheinov Viktor Pavlovich

2.3. MOST COMMON CONFLICT GENERATORS Types of conflictogensRules 1 and 2 of conflict-free communication are easier to follow when you know what can serve as a conflictogen. This is facilitated by their specific classification. Most conflictogens can be attributed to

From the book Accentuated Personalities author Leonhard Karl

TYPES OF PERSONALITIES The decisive influence of personality structure on the fate of a person does not need a long justification. That is why every serious researcher, based on his clinical or psychological practice and his own theoretical views, built his own

From the book Psychology of Adulthood author Ilyin Evgeny Pavlovich

5.8. Types of wives and husbands MS Matskovsky (1978) distinguishes three types of wives. The first type is the mistress wife, for whom the most important thing is the family - husband, children, home. She devotes a huge part of her time to childcare and housework. Her main thoughts are that the economy is conducted economically,

From the book Hu from hu? [Psychological Intelligence Manual] author Kurpatov Andrey Vladimirovich

TYPES OF "PREDICTIONS" "Predictions" about yourself "I can't" (or "I can"), "I can't" (or "I can"), "I definitely can't do it" (or "I can do it") , “I will never succeed” (or “I will succeed”), “this is too difficult for me” (or “this is easy for me”), “I am 100%

author Sheinov Viktor Pavlovich

Conflictogens - “viruses” of random conflicts I originally defined the concept of “conflictogen” in my work. Conflictogenes are words, actions (or inaction, if action is required) that can lead to conflict. The word “powerful” is the key here,

From the book Conflict Management author Sheinov Viktor Pavlovich

How to “tame” conflictogens Due to the destructive nature of random conflicts, it is quite natural to look for ways to reduce the likelihood of their occurrence. The latter depends on the actions of each of the parties to the potential conflict.

From the book Work and Personality [Workaholism, Perfectionism, Laziness] author Ilyin Evgeny Pavlovich

7.6. Types of Workaholics Maclowitz (1980) identified four types of workaholics, depending on how focused they are on their work or whether they have other interests.

From the book Woman plus Man [To Know and Conquer] author Sheinov Viktor Pavlovich

How conflicts flare up, formulas for their resolution. Conflictogens 80% of conflicts arise apart from the desire of their participants. This happens due to the peculiarities of the psyche and the fact that most people either do not know about them or do not attach importance to them. The main role in the occurrence

From the book How to read a person. Facial features, gestures, postures, facial expressions author Ravensky Nikolai

From the Rules book. Laws of Success author Canfield Jack

Types of coaching Coaching can be individual or group. Most often, it is carried out regularly by phone, although it can also be carried out in person, to whom it is more convenient. During the classes, you and your coach will learn how to set goals, develop strategies and plans

From the book Getting rid of all diseases. Self love lessons author Tarasov Evgeny Alexandrovich

From the book Integral Relations author Uchik Martin

Types of NLP Neuro-Linguistic Programming, or NLP, is a technique that was created in the 1970s to improve therapy and personal success by reproducing effective patterns of behavior and communication. This model soon became

Communicative conflictogenics are words, phrases, intonations and other small moments in communication that create tension in a conversation and provoke a conflict. As a rule, everything that goes beyond the expected and acceptable style of communication turns out to be a communicative conflict generator.

In order to prevent conflictogens, it is useful to know them "by sight". Even seemingly educated people in a conversation, in a fit of emotion, often allow (and do not notice) harshness, disrespect for the interlocutor or a position of superiority.

The most common conflictogens are categorical, harsh and aggressive tone, negative assessments and an appeal to a topic that is unpleasant for the interlocutor. Disputes on painful topics are launched by us only because we do not think why we are now saying this or that, we do not try on how it will be perceived by the interlocutor. So, typical conflictogens of this circle:

No. You're wrong. What are you? Nothing like this! I explain. What if you think? Actually... Now more... Nonsense.

You see... you know... How can I explain this to you... Obviously... I don't understand why you...

A variation on the position of superiority is morality reading: telling what a person knows well without you, such as "Things must be put in their place!" and boredom next to him, indifference to him (to what is interesting and important for him).

Come on! Oh, God, how tired I am of this... Look, I'm busy now, let's do something next time (if this next time is repeated many times).

The most unexpected of conflictogens is humor for a partner and.

Humor on a partner usually amuses everyone, except for the one to whom it is directed, and excuses are annoying because no one needs them, except for the one who makes excuses.

In a conversation with the head of conflictogens, the wording “I believe” and “I think” will be more appropriate, “I think” and “In my opinion” will be more appropriate. Interestingly, in a business conversation, the phrases “I am surprised”, “I was offended”, “I was upset because of you” and, in principle, talking about my feelings turn out to be conflictogenic.

Talking about your feelings that is appropriate in a personal communication, as a rule, is inappropriate in a business context.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Helping the client in choosing the product or service he needs, we periodically encounter the so-called "conflict clients". What are they? Why do they behave like this? Are there many of them? How to behave with them?

Before readers answer these questions, let them try to remember themselves in the role of a client. Have you always been pleased to communicate with sellers or people who provide you with a service? Far from everyone can boast of one hundred percent only positive emotions, being as a client.

But can you call yourself a conflict client? Hardly. After all, each of us considers himself quite polite and correct. And if we are all so polite, then where do these conflicting clients come from, and in such numbers?! According to the statistics that the author collected during his trainings, at least a third, or even almost half of all clients are in conflict.

I propose another experiment: imagine that you turned to the seller with a question, and you hear in response:

You did not carefully read the information at the entrance.

This is not a beige color, but the color of baked milk.

Can't you see, I'm busy, contact someone else.

You like? Have you lost the desire to continue communicating with this seller? Most likely, in all three cases, desire has significantly decreased, as well as good mood. But what happened? It seems that the seller didn’t say anything criminal, and didn’t even get nasty. However, all of these phrases contain something that provokes a negative reaction and aggression. And it's something called conflictogen .

“The whole world is a theater.
In it, women, men - all actors.
They have their own exits, departures,
And everyone plays more than one role"

So, a conflictogen is a word, phrase, position or action that provokes a negative response. Conflictogens are best described by the Parent-Adult-Child model. This model was created Eric Bern. He talks about it in detail in his book “People who play games. Games People Play".

Mr. Bern says that although we have all grown up, there is in each of us: Parent, Adult and Child. We do not just remember the behavior of our parents, we even try to copy it at some points, or this happens involuntarily. But it is important not to confuse the role of the Parent and the real parent as an individual. After all, all three roles are also present in the real parent.

Parent

The role of the Parent, its main function, is to educate. He educates due to the fact that he knows how to wait. He has a lot of life experience, which is a pantry of norms and rules. The parent lives and communicates on the basis of social norms: “That’s not how things are done!”, “Boys shouldn’t cry!”, “Elders should give way!”.

He says "may" or "no" , when it is forbidden or allowed. And to forbid or allow him allows him power over the child. He says: "We must." And thanks to power, the parent gives orders to the child. Still he evaluates personality and says a good child or a bad one: “I did my homework - well done. You didn’t - you’re bad and you won’t go for a walk today.

Child

The role of the Child is the state of a person and his behavior, similar to children's behavior. We all remember how we behaved in childhood. We have grown up, but there is a child in each of us. It personifies our feelings and emotions, a sense of dependence on adults and defenselessness.

In a critical situation, the Child may begin to justify or lie, fearing punishment. Means, disclaimer - this is a characteristic feature of a child and an immature personality.

The interplay of these two roles within each of us can be illustrated by an everyday example. So, imagine the morning of a working day. The alarm clock rings and the first “in your head” wakes up the Parent. He says: “You have to get up for work!”. And the Child answers him: “No, I want to sleep!”.

And this bickering can go on for a very long time, until the Adult enters into the dialogue. He assesses the situation and analyzes the risks. That is what happens if you stay to sleep or go to work. And you act on the basis of the conclusions that the Adult makes. He can find a compromise, satisfying the interests of the Parent and the Child. For example, he will allow you to sleep an extra 5-10 minutes, and drink coffee at work so as not to be late.

Adult

The Role of the Adult this is the state of a person and his behavior aimed at an objective assessment of reality. In this state, a person processes information and calculates the probabilities that he needs to effectively interact with the outside world. The Adult controls the communication between the Parent and the Child, that is, it is an intermediary between them.

Human interaction

Now consider communication between two people. Let's take a simple example first. Morning. Husband and wife are going to work. The husband calmly asks his wife, “Where is my shirt?” (Figure 1 shows a diagram in which this communication is drawn by a horizontal line from adult to adult, the so-called "communication on an equal footing").

To which his wife can answer him from three positions. For example:

Parent with hands on hips: “I don’t have to follow your shirts!”

Child with a guilty look: "I don't know."

Adult: "Remember where you last placed it."

Communications from the Parent to the Child and vice versa are depicted in Figure 1 as straight lines from top to bottom diagonally from bottom to top, respectively.

In the same way, often, service workers communicate. When asked by a client in a difficult situation, they can also answer any of the three roles. For example, a client in a restaurant approached the cloakroom attendant and asked: “I lost my number.” This is a simple question from the role of an Adult. The negotiator may answer:

- "Didn't you lose your head?" or “I don’t know, this is your problem” (Parent)

- “Oh, I don’t decide anything, I’m on my second day of work ...” (Child)

- “Now we will solve the situation ...” (Adult)

Each time, the Child, Parent or Adult comes to the fore for each of us. Everyone has a favorite role. But in a difficult, conflict situation, it is useful to be an Adult. The main mistake is to be in conflict and when communicating with a client to be a Child or a Parent. Remember the tephrases that were given at the beginning of the article. This is just the words of the Parent. That is why they are negatively perceived.

Figure 1. Psychological positions in communion according to Eric Berne

"Provocateurs"

There are a number of conflictogens that are unacceptable when communicating with a client.

The "Top" or "Parent" position appears either:

in non-verbal dominance: look down, arms to the sides,

in verbal superiority.

Table 1. Examples of conflictogens

Position

Description

Estimated position

Evaluation of the correctness or incorrectness of the client's actions. He is good or bad. "I'm fine, but you're not", "I'm better than you", "You're worse than me."

duty

Relations with the client are built only on contractual relations. If you do not like something, do not call the client to conscience, do not tell him what he should be and what he should do. Don't lecture the client.

Direct displays of superiority

An order, a threat, a remark or any other negative assessment, criticism, accusation, ridicule, mockery, sarcasm.

condescending attitude

A display of superiority, but with a touch of benevolence. A condescending tone is also a conflictogen: “Do not be offended”, “Calm down”, “How can you not know this?”, “Don’t you understand?”, “You were told in Russian”, “You are a smart person, but you act ...”. It should be remembered here: “If you are smarter than others, then no one do not speak about it" .

Boasting

An enthusiastic story about one's successes, true or imaginary, causes irritation, a desire to "put in place" a braggart.

The manifestation of excessive self-righteousness, self-confidence; assumes its superiority and subordination of the interlocutor. A categorical tone is also a conflictogen: “I believe”, “I am sure”, “I am right”. Instead, it is safer to use statements that are less forceful: “I think”, “It seems to me”, “I have the impression that ...”. Peremptory phrases like: “All men are scoundrels”, “All women are liars”, “Everyone steals”, “... and end this conversation” are also conflictogens of this type.

Imposing your advice

The adviser essentially takes a position of superiority. There is a rule: give advice only when asked for it.

Thus, the interrupter demonstrates that his thoughts are more valuable than the thoughts of others, and therefore it is he who should be listened to.

Ethics violation (intentional or unintentional)

cause inconvenience (accidentally pushed, stepped on the foot) and did not apologize;

not invited to sit;

not saying hello or saying hello to the same person several times during the day;

climb in” without a queue, using a friend or his own bossy position.

banter

His object is usually the one who for some reason cannot give a worthy rebuff. After all, the ridiculed will look for an opportunity to get even with the offender.

Deception or attempted deception

This means to achieve the goal dishonestly and it is the strongest conflict generator.

Reminder (possibly unintentional)

For example, about some losing situation for the interlocutor.

Among the words-conflictogens, the following can be noted: “No”, “In vain”, “Calm down”, “Don't be nervous” and any rude or abusive word.

Now you know how to avoid being a parent in customer relationships. But how to behave if the interaction started with the client-Parent?

Algorithm for working in a conflict situation with a conflict client

When you see that a person can hardly restrain himself, raises his voice, and is indignant, then you need to behave like that. Firstly,need to let the customer "Chill out". Let him speak out and let go of his emotions. Your job is just to be quiet. At this moment it is very important to be congruent(that is, appropriate to the situation). Under no circumstances should you smile. The client may think that they are just being bullied. And in no case do not say: "Calm down", "Don't be nervous." These words, as we have already found out, will only add fuel to the fire and aggravate the situation.

Secondly, need "Take into consideration". Taking into account is a response in the video of encouraging remarks and summing up conclusions that will testify to the correct understanding of what was said. Listening shows interest and concern, and recognition shows understanding and participation.

Therefore, there is no need to waste time and nerves of the client. Just ask him, “How can I help you? What would you like me to do for you?" At this point, the responsibility is divided in half between the seller and the buyer. The seller must confess within himself that he does not know what to do. So he asks the buyer. His task is to stay in the position of an Adult and not succumb to incitement. The task of the client is to knock him out of this situation, if the buyer does this, he will win. And if the seller resists, then everyone wins: the seller, the buyer, and the store.

The client, of course, can ask: "Jump one leg." But this does not mean that it is necessary to satisfy all whims of customers. The seller will answer: “I cannot do this for you, since this is not part of my duties. What can I do for you to resolve this situation. Let's think together."

Fourth, the seller must honestly "Fulfill the agreement."

In order for you to have conflicting clients as rarely as possible or not at all, the author recommends accepting all of the above as a good standard for communication between service personnel and clients.

Olga Gennadievna Dobrovolskaya

Conflictogen is an element of communication that creates tension in communication and generates conflicts.

The nature of conflictogens.

The cause of almost any conflict is the desire to satisfy such dark sides of the personality as aggressiveness, vanity, striving for superiority, boasting, etc. The initiator of the conflict, deliberately throwing a conflictogen into communication, as a rule, achieves the following:

  • To offend a person by showing him open distrust.
  • Emphasize the difference between yourself and your opponent, to your advantage, of course.
  • “Lower” the importance of the opponent, thereby “raising” your own. The purpose of the conscious use of conflictogens is to cause a conflict in order to obtain some benefit or solve their psychological problems.

It also happens that the conflict arises due to a misunderstanding. Or someone just needs to be “put in their place”.

Classification of conflictogens.

In the process of communication, people quite often use conflictogens. This is partly due to the negative qualities inherent in many of us, which were mentioned above, partly due to a combination of circumstances. In general, a small number of moderate conflictogens in communication is even useful - it enlivens the conversation. But it should be understood that adequacy, among other things, is also an awareness of the boundaries of what is permitted and an understanding of the measure.

Conflictogens can be non-verbal and verbal.

Imagine that you are addressing a person, and he shows you a closed pose - arms folded on his chest, etc. and a contemptuous smirk on his face.

Of the non-verbal, the most powerful conflict generator is ignoring. Most of us cannot stand it when he addresses someone, and the opponent looks at him as if he were an empty place.

Verbal conflictogens include an expression of distrust, or a negative attitude towards the interlocutor.

  • Do you believe in yourself? Or
  • Do you understand something in this? Or
  • Frankly speaking, it is unpleasant for me to communicate with you. And so on.
  • Conflictogens can be accusatory phrases, for example:
  • Why did I trust you. Or
  • All the blame for this lies entirely with you. Or
  • I don't think you are clean.

Conflictogens can also be:

  • interrupting the speaker;
  • unwillingness to listen;
  • belittling the role of the interlocutor and his contribution to the matter;
  • exaggeration of one's own merits;

Also conflictogenic is the marking of differences:

  • Age.

I was already doing science when you just stopped peeing in your pants.

  • Social.

Who am I and who are you!

  • Geographic.

Everyone knows the attitude of Muscovites towards limiters (this is before) and visitors in search of a better life (now). Reaction: in the outback, Muscovites are not particularly liked.

A refined conflictogen is a condescending attitude towards the interlocutor, humiliating him under the guise of benevolence:

You seem to be a smart person, but you act like a boy. Or

Don't be offended, my dear, you better run and get me coffee. Or.

Don't be so picky, you'll get away with it.

Conflictogens are words of threat, for example:

You will still regret it

We'll deal with you again

Conflictogens are also replicas - shoulds:

  • You are obliged.
  • You are completely responsible for this.
  • You must and so on.

Also conflictogenic are such forms of behavior as:

  • Insult.
  • mockery.
  • The use of nicknames.
  • Name distortion.
  • Unexpected interruption of the conversation.

The Law of Escalation conflictogens.

In most cases, conflicts arise as if by themselves, as if without our desire.

The fact is that we tend to attach great importance to what other people say, in particular to us, but we are not particularly critical of our own words. Someone else's dignity and significance are of little concern to us, unless it is a person close to us, but we, as a rule, react sharply to attempts to encroach on ours.

The pattern of escalation of conflictogens is based on the fact that we respond to an attack against us with the “strongest” conflictogen of all that arise in our head. This happens because, having received a psychological slap in the face, we strive to respond in kind, or even cause more damage.

During conflict, we move into the emotive plane. And emotions, as you know, are always right, not because they judge correctly, but because they do not judge at all.

Everything - as in a fight - we are so arranged. Although religion and morality call people to restraint.

When we calm down, we tend to regret what happened. Especially if communication with the person with whom the quarrel occurred, we want, or are forced to continue.

It is always easier to extinguish a conflict at the stage of an exchange of conflictogens than to go directly out of it, and, moreover, to rake up its consequences.

There is a great wisdom: the one who is smarter is to blame for the conflict. Be smart.

Conflict formula.

The conflict formula is as follows:

Imagine that you have a co-worker who occasionally asks you to stay in the evening to finish his work. You don’t need it, it’s unpleasant, every time you try to protest, but your colleague is an experienced manipulator and finds such tricks that every time he manages to persuade you to stay to work for him.

Sometimes it just infuriates you, you are terribly angry, at yourself in the first place.

That is, there is a conflict situation.

Imagine further that one fine day your wife announces to you that tomorrow you and your whole family are going to the Philharmonic to listen to her favorite performer. You look at her, you see the sparkle in her eyes, and you understand that this is very important for her. And you also understand that if for some reason you don’t go, your relationship will deteriorate for a long time.

The next day, at lunch, your colleague, putting his arm around your shoulders and looking into your eyes, says:

Buddy, save me, my report has not been completed, I must hand it in tomorrow, and then an army friend arrives. If I don't meet him, you know what will happen.

You answer:

I'm sorry, but I can't do anything today. I promised my wife to go with her to the Philharmonic.

Colleague:

My friend, what the hell is the Philharmonic, help me out. You know, army friendship is the strongest. Help me out and ask whatever you want.

You remember your wife's eyes and say:

No, I can’t do it today, he promised.

The colleague continues to insist:

But you understand that friendship is sacred, can't you help? You, too, will have to turn to me someday... And so on.

Classic incident. If you give up, you will offend someone you love. You cannot do this.

You are boiling. You are overwhelmed with rejection, resentment, hatred, anger, protest ... And looking at your colleague with hatred, you shout:

Yes, you went along with your army friend ... And never come to me again with your stupid requests ... Etc. etc. etc.

Conflict, with all the ensuing consequences. You have a potential enemy, and since you work together, you can expect a "poison arrow".

What would I do in this situation:

I would use one of, for example, a “played record”.

To the request of a colleague, I would answer this way:

Sorry, friend, I would love to help you, but I already promised my wife to go with her to the Philharmonic. Now, if you had told me that yesterday, it would have been a different matter. But today, I can't! It's his own fault, I should have said yesterday that your friend is coming today.

I would repeat this rubbish in response to all the attempts of a colleague to persuade me.

An interesting detail: when you use a defensive technique, you leave the emotional plane and look at the situation without emotions and with curiosity (what he will do next). And you will not be convinced, because you know what is happening, what will be the reaction of the opponent, and how the confrontation will end.

Conflict people.

I had a friend who is now deceased. In the infamous nineties, he was a pretty tough thug. From time to time we talked, but we did not have common affairs with him - I am far from crime.

Once we agreed to meet, I don’t remember for what reason. When I arrived, there was a man with him - a man of intelligent appearance, wearing glasses, tastefully dressed. His speech was correct, literary, manners pleasant and disposing.

Soon he left and I asked:

- Do you have acquaintances from academia?

The friend laughed and called his name.

It turns out that he was a very well-known and very tough bandit.

I was amazed at the discrepancy between the appearance and the internal content, to which my friend replied:

A smart and cool person is always polite. And he always watches his speech, especially with strangers. It is unknown who this person might be.

This is especially important in our environment - you need to watch your words very carefully, otherwise you can run into serious trouble. There are words for which it is not easy may stick a knife in the stomach, it's easy obliged will do.

I remember it.

These are extremes. The specificity of the dark sides of life. However, the reality is that almost any conflict begins either with the launch of a conflictogen by one of the parties into communication, or with an exchange of them.

I remember, as a child, I lived in a green cozy courtyard, where one of my neighbors was a middle-aged man who even had the appropriate nickname - “Scandal”.

For example, he approached the men playing dominoes, watched the game for several minutes and began:

What did you bet, he shouted at one of the players, you should have been hollow, idiot, if you don’t know how to play, why the hell are you sitting down to play? And he began to "carry".

It all ended with the fact that the people “boiled”, they beat him, slightly true, a neighbor, nevertheless, and sent him home.

All this was repeated in various scenery regularly.

Such brawlers in their purest form are a rarity (I was lucky), however, the fact that due to the complex nature of some people it is easy, seemingly out of the blue, conflicts arise is a fact.

The main character traits of such people are morbid pride and truly donkey stubbornness in cases where it is required to give up their desires and habits. I would also emphasize rigidity and uncontrollability in their characters. Almost all of them are burdened with many complexes, including an inferiority complex.

Fortunately, there are not many such people.

How to communicate without conflict.

If you know that you have an aggressive nature, learn to keep your aggression on a short leash. Don't try to show your superiority, people don't like that. Remember that a self-sufficient, “cool” person will never prove his coolness without a reason.

And vice versa, if someone demonstrates this quality without an objective necessity, it becomes clear to the audience that, first of all, this person seeks to prove something to himself. People will immediately understand that you have an inferiority complex.

Curb your selfishness. If you jump in front of some driver in a parking space, while he was aiming to get up there, or with a scandal, transfer the work that, by and large, you should have done to someone else's shoulders, or, pursuing your goals, with a fight, “snatch” the benefits belonging to others, know that you are throwing a conflictogen into communication. Most often, it will “get through”, but it may happen that you, well, very much, will regret that you were not able to curb your egoism.

And in general, the reputation of an egoist has not painted anyone yet.

Do not use conflictogens first and do not respond with a conflictogen to a conflictogen. Determining whether what you want to say to another person is a conflict generator is not difficult. Just pause and imagine how you would feel if you were told what you are about to say.

Humans, for the most part, are beautiful creatures. And believe me, in a normal situation, they will treat you exactly as you treat them.